Quantcast
Channel: Andy Soffer » Set Theory
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9

Every vector space has a basis

$
0
0

If you haven’t seen a Zorn’s lemma argument before, this will probably be bewildering. It is here for the sake of completeness.

Theorem:

Every vector space V has a basis.

Proof:
Consider the collection of linearly independent sets ordered by inclusion. So if S and T are linearly independent sets, and S\subseteq T, We would say S\leq T. Of course, it may be that we have sets neither of which is a subset of the other. This is totally fine, since we are in a partially ordered set, or poset.

Zorn’s lemma says that if every chain has an upper bound, then there is a maximal element. That is, if we take a bunch of linearly independent sets that are all comparable (one contains the other), and they have an upper bound, then there is a set M which is maximal in the sense that nothing contains it. Such a maximal set must have \mbox{span}(M)=V, for if it didn’t, we could add another element to it from V\setminus\mbox{span}(M), so it wouldn’t be maximal. By virtue of being in the partially ordered set to begin with, M must be linearly independent. As M is linearly independent and spanning, it is by definition a basis.

So we only need to show that every chain has an upper bound. If I have a bunch of linearly independent sets S_\alpha (possibly infinitely many, and a really big infinity too) and they form a chain of containment, we want to find a really big linearly independent set that contains all of the S_\alpha. It turns out that

\displaystyle\bigcup_\alpha S_\alpha

works. Why? We just need to show that it is linearly independent. Well, the trick is that linear combinations have to be finite. So if I had some linear dependence

\lambda_1 s_1+\lambda_2 s_2+\cdots+\lambda_n s_n=0,

There must be some \alpha for which the \{s_1,s_2,\dots,s_n\}\subseteq S_\alpha. But then, since S_\alpha is linearly independent, each of the \lambda_i must be zero as desired.

\square

Zorn’s lemma is always weird if you haven’t done it before. Luckily, you can try your own. Another theorem is that if we have a linearly independent set S, we can extend it to a basis for our vector space. Try to recreate Zorn’s lemma argument. Instead of starting with all linearly independent sets, start with all linearly independent sets which contain S.



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9

Trending Articles